4.3 Article

Development of a method for determination of VOCs (including methylsiloxanes) in biogas by TD-GC/MS analysis using Supel™ Inert Film bags and multisorbent bed tubes

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2015.1016012

关键词

volatile organic compounds; TD-GC/MS; waste treatment; biogas; volatile methylsiloxanes

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analytical method based on TD-GC/MS was developed and validated for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including linear and cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs), in biogas. Biogas was first sampled in Supel (TM) Inert Film bags and subsequently dynamically sampled onto multisorbent bed tubes (Carbotrap, Carbopack X and Carboxen 569) using portable pump equipment. Two sample volumes, 100 and 250ml, were evaluated. Desorption efficiency values for both volumes are in the range of 99-100% for almost all studied compounds while breakthrough values (%VOC on sample tube back section) are below 1% for most evaluated VOCs. However, acetaldehyde, carbon disulphide, ethanol and 1,3-butadiene have breakthrough values higher than 5%. Method detection limits were in the range of 0.01-0.8 ng per sample. The most abundant VOCs in biogas were terpenes with concentrations between 500 and 700mgm(-3). Other important families were ketones, aromatic hydrocarbons and alkanes, with concentrations in the range of 36-46, 20-35 and 14-16mgm(-3), respectively. VMSs presented average concentrations of 4.9 +/- 0.4mgm(-3). Additionally, the Supel (TM) Inert Film bags were evaluated for stability for 4days at room temperature. Although several VOC families' concentrations in the bag increased or decreased significantly (t-test; p <= 0.01, n=5) 2days after collection, recoveries were around 70-130% for most studied VOCs. The results shown demonstrate that the presented methodology is reliable and satisfactory for the evaluation of VOCs in biogas and presents an alternative to the currently existing biogas analytical techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据