4.5 Article

Application of quantitative microbial risk assessment for selection of microbial reduction targets for hard surface disinfectants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 1165-1172

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.024

关键词

Microbial surface contamination; Fomite; Dose-response

资金

  1. Procter & Gamble, Cincinatti, OH [RC102673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) included problem formulation for fomites and hazard identification for 7 microorganisms, including pathogenic Escherichia coli and E coli 0157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, norovirus, Pseudomonas spp, Salmonella spp, and Staphylococcus aureus. The goal was to address a risk-based process for choosing the log(10) reduction recommendations, in contrast to the current US Environmental Protection Agency requirements. Method: For each microbe evaluated, the QMRA model included specific dose-response models, occurrence determination of aerobic bacteria and specific organisms on fomites, exposure assessment, risk characterization, and risk reduction. Risk estimates were determined for a simple scenario using a single touch of a contaminated surface and self-inoculation. A comparative analysis of log(10) reductions, as suggested by the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the risks based on this QMRA approach was also undertaken. Results: The literature review and meta-analysis showed that aerobic bacteria were the most commonly studied on fomites, averaging 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/cm(2). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found at a level of 3.3 x 10(-1) CFU/cm(2); methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), at 6.4 x 10(-1) CFU/cm(2). Risk estimates per contact event ranged from a high of 10(-3) for norovirus to a low of 10(-9) for S aureus. Conclusion: This QMRA analysis suggests that a reduction in bacterial numbers on a fomite by 99% (2 logs) most often will reduce the risk of infection from a single contact to less than 1 in 1 million. Copyright (C) 2014 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据