4.5 Article

Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: A review of the literature

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 85-93

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 A10761-3]
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Raearch, and Development Service [RC-042-026.2, IIR-05.123.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Contact Precautions (CP) are a standard method for preventing patient-to-patient transmission of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings. With the ongoing worldwide concern for MDROs including methicillin-resistant Staphyloroccus aureus (MRSA) and broadened use of active surveillance programs, an increasing number of patients are being placed on CP Whereas few would argue that CP are an important tool in infection control, many reports and small studies have observed worse noninfectious outcomes in patients on CP. However, no review of this literature exists. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature describing adverse outcomes associated with CP. We identified 15 studies published between 1989 and 2008 relating to adverse Outcomes from CF. Nine were higher quality based on standardized collection of data and/or inclusion of control groups. Results: Four main adverse outcomes related to CP were identified in this review. These included less patient-health care worker contact, changes in systems of care that produce delays and more noninfectious adverse events, increased symptoms of depression and anxiety, and decreased patient satisfaction with care. Conclusion: Although CP are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an intervention to control spread of MDROs, our review of the literature demonstrates that this approach has unintended consequences that are potentially deleterious to the patient. Measures to ameliorate these deleterious consequences of CP are urgently needed. Copyright (C) 2009 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据