4.2 Article

Occupational benzene exposure and the risk of chronic myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis of cohort studies incorporating study quality dimensions

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 9, 页码 779-785

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22087

关键词

benzene; chronic myeloid leukemia; occupational exposure; meta-analysis

资金

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  2. European commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We documented previously that if study quality is accounted for, evidence from occupational cohort studies on benzene supports a possible association with some lymphoma subtypes, in particular multiple myeloma, and acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Here, we extend these analyses to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods Three strategies to assess study quality (stratification by the year-of-start of follow-up, stratification by the strength of the reported acute myeloid leukemia (AML) association, and stratification by the quality of benzene exposure assessment) were employed in a meta-analysis of occupational benzene exposure and CML. We hypothesized that stratification by these study quality dimensions would identify a subgroup of occupational cohort studies that is most informative for the evaluation of the possible association between benzene and CML. Results The overall meta-relative risk (mRR) was non-significantly elevated (1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.931.63). The mRRs increased with increasing study quality for all dimensions with a significant elevation for studies with start of follow-up after 1970 (1.67; 95% CI: 1.022.74). The highest study quality stratum for AML significance and exposure quality showed an elevated but non-significant increased mRR (1.40; 95% CI: 0.862.27, and 1.68; 95% CI: 0.743.84, respectively). Conclusions Although limited by low statistical power, the current meta-analysis provides support for a possible association of occupational exposure to benzene and the risk of CML. Am. J. Ind. Med. 55:779785, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据