4.3 Article

Plasma Pentraxin3 and Arterial Stiffness in Men With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 401-407

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2010.248

关键词

cardio-ankle vascular index; continuous positive airway pressure; C-reactive protein; inflammation

资金

  1. Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) induces inflammation and vascular damage that might contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the mechanisms linking OSA and CVD are not fully understood. Pentraxin3 may play a significant role in vascular inflammation and damage. Currently, there is lack of data on pentraxin3 and its role in vascular damage associated with OSA. METHODS We enrolled 50 males with OSA and 25 controls matched for age and body mass index (BMI). Patients with OSA were further divided into mild and moderate to severe groups. We measured plasma pentraxin3 and evaluated vascular damage using an arterial stiffness parameter - the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) - in all subjects. In the moderate to severe OSA group, pentraxin3 and CAVI were repeatedly measured following continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for 1 month. RESULTS Pentraxin3 levels in the moderate-to-severe OSA group were significantly higher than those in the mild OSA and control groups, with median levels (25th-75th percentile) of 2.36(1.79-2.78), 1.63 (1.15-2.05), and 1.53 (1.14-2.04) ng/ml, respectively (P < 0.01). Pentraxin3 level was independently correlated with CAVI (coefficient, 0.34 P < 0.01). In the moderate-to-severe OSA group, pentraxin3 and CAVI levels were significantly reduced (P < 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively) after 1 month of CPAP therapy. CONCLUSIONS Plasma pentraxin3 and arterial stiffness levels in the moderate-to-severe OSA group were greater than the corresponding levels in patients without OSA. However, pentraxin3 level can be managed by CPAP therapy for OSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据