4.3 Article

Prehypertension Subtype With Elevated C-Reactive Protein: Risk of Ischemic Stroke in a General Japanese Population

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1108-1113

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2010.134

关键词

blood pressure; cerebral infarction; cohort study; hypertension

资金

  1. Japan Atherosclerosis Prevention Fund
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan [17120501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Prehypertension (PreHT) and low-grade inflammation are both known to be related to the incidence of cardiovascular events. This cohort study investigated whether the high-risk group for future ischemic stroke among PreHT subjects can be predicted by stratification of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). METHODS A total of 22,676 subjects aged 40-80 years from the general population who had no cardiovascular history underwent baseline measurement of serum hsCRP, and were followed for the incidence of ischemic stroke. RESULTS During the mean follow-up period of 2.7 years, 143 subjects had a first ischemic stroke. In a Cox multivariable model after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, there was no significant difference in hazard ratio (HR) for incidence of ischemic stroke between the normotension NT) and PreHT subjects (HR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-3.18, vs. NT subjects). In contrast, the HR for incidence of ischemic stroke in PreHT subjects with higher hsCRP levels (>= 0.5 mg/l in men, >= 0.4 mg/l in women, more than median levels according to sex) was increased compared to NT subjects with lower hsCRP levels (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.11-6.24). Moreover, the HR for incidence of ischemic stroke in PreHT subjects with lower CRP levels (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.31-2.73) did not differ from that in NT subjects with lower hsCRP levels. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that, in a Japanese general population, hsCRP was a marker for relatively short-term risk of ischemic stroke in PreHT subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据