4.3 Article

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Primary Aldosteronism: A Pilot Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 2-5

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2009.206

关键词

blood pressure; essential hypertension; hypertension; NAFLD; primary aldosteronism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND An impairment of glucose metabolism, contributing to the increased cardiovascular risk, has been shown in primary aldosteronism (PA). Insulin resistance is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and may play a role in its pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between NAFLD and PA, and to identify determinants of NAFLD in this condition. METHODS A total of 40 patients with RA, 40 sex-, age-, and body mass index matched patients with low-renin essential hypertension (LREH) and 40 normotensive subjects were studied. According to ultrasound detection of fatty liver, each group was subdivided in two subsets: with NAFLD and without NAFLD. Patients with diabetes, obesity, and hyperlipidemia were excluded. RESULTS Prevalence of NAFLD in PA was similar to that observed in LREH patients, and higher (P < 0.01) than in normotensive controls. Serum potassium was lower in PA than in LREH patients with NAFLD (P < 0.001), while it was similar in PA and LREH patients without NAFLD. At univariate analysis, plasma aldosterone, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index and hypokalemia were determinants of NAFLD in PA (P < 0.05), while HOMA index was associated with NAFLD in LREH (P < 0.05). At multivariable analysis, only hypokalemia remained associated with NAFLD in PA (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The results of this pilot study suggest that, in the absence of major risk factors for liver disease, NAFLD is a frequent finding in PA. Patients with PA and hypokalemia are more insulin resistant and have higher prevalence of NAFLD than those with normokalemia, indicating greater risk for metabolic and liver disease in this subgroup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据