4.3 Article

Nitric Oxide and Reactive Hyperemia: Role of Location and Duration of Ischemia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 865-869

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2010.72

关键词

blood pressure; hypertension; ischemia at the upper arm; ischemia at the wrist; L-NMMA; nitric oxide; reactive hyperemia

资金

  1. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
  2. Fresenius Medical Care AG, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Ischemia-induced reactive hyperemia (RH) is mediated by various factors including release of nitric oxide (NO). the contribution of NO to RH equals the extent of L-NMMA-dependent reduction of forearm blood flow (FBF). Because the optimal duration and location of ischemia that provokes maximum NO activation is unknown, we analyzed which duration and location stimulates most NO release, aiming at developing a noninvasive tool to measure endothelial integrity by NO synthase activity in humans. METHODS FBF was measured by strain gauge plethysmography after ischemia applied at the upper arm and wrist during intra-arterial infusion of L-NMMA or saline. to obtain similar FBF before RH, clamping with sodium nitroprissude was performed. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to two groups (N = 15) undergoing ischemia of 1 and 5 min or 2 and 5 min (N = 13) at both locations. RESULTS Peak FBF was not affected by L-NMMA infusion. the change of FBF during L-NMMA expressed as area under the curve (AUC) of the first minute was significantly reduced after 1 (-0.70 +/- 1.63 ml, P < 0.001) and 2 min (1.67 +/- 2.65 ml, P < 0.01) of ischemia applied at wrist level compared to 5 min (7.49 +/- 7.92 ml). Ischemia applied to the upper arm showed no significant differences of FBF after L-NMMA or saline infusion, irrespective of the duration of ischemia. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that only immediately after ischemia the vasodilatatory response is most NO-dependent. RH as a test of NO activity in the forearm microcirculation should be applied at the wrist and last 1 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据