4.3 Article

Dietary Protein Level Interacts With ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Deficiency to Induce Hypertension

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 125-128

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2009.198

关键词

omega-3; blood pressure; dietary protein; hypertension

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [217011]
  2. NHMRC of Australia [350313]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0883996]
  4. Deakin University Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  5. Australian Research Council [LP0883996] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Dietary omega-3 fatty acid deficiency can lead to hypertension in later life; however, hypertension is affected by numerous other dietary factors. We examined the effect of altering the dietary protein level on blood pressure in animals deficient or sufficient in omega-3 fatty acids. METHODS Female rats were placed on one of four experimental diets 1 week prior to mating. Diets were either deficient (10% safflower oil; DEF) or sufficient (7% safflower oil, 3% flaxseed oil; SU F) in omega-3 fatty acids and contained 20 or 30% casein (DEF20, SUF20, DEF30, SUF30). Offspring were maintained on the maternal diet for the duration of the experiment. At 12,18,24, and 30 weeks, blood pressure was assessed by tail cuff plethysmography. RESULTS At both 12 and 18 weeks of age, no differences in blood pressure were observed based on diet, however, by 24 weeks hypertension was evident in DEF30 animals; there were no blood pressure differences between the other groups. This hypertension in DEF30 group was increased at 30 weeks, with systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure all elevated. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that the hypertension previously attributed to omega-3 fatty acid deficiency is dependent on additional dietary factors, including protein content. Furthermore, this study is the first to plot the establishment of omega-3 fatty acid deficiency hypertension over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据