4.3 Article

Podocyte Loss in Human Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 300-306

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.360

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hong Kong Society of Nephrology Research
  2. CUHK [6901031, 7101215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND METHODS We studied 41 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven hypertensive nephropathy, 10 cadaveric kidney donors, and 9 healthy subjects. Intrarenal and urinary mRNA expression of podocyte-associated molecules was quantified and podocyte number was determined by stereological method.Podocyte injury probably plays important roles in the pathogenesis of hypertensive nephropathy, but human data are limited. We studied glomerular podocyte count and intrarenal expression of podocyte-associated molecules in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis. RESULTS Intrarenal mRNA expression levels of nephrin, podocin, and synaptopodin were lower, and urinary mRNA expression levels were higher in patients with hypertensive nephropathy than controls. Glomerular podocyte number was significantly lower in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis than kidney donors (545 +/- 237 vs. 773 +/- 296 per glomeruli, P < 0.02). Podocyte density and intrarenal gene expression of podocyte-associated molecules significantly correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and inversely correlated with blood pressure and the degree of renal fibrosis. Intrarenal gene expression of nephrin significantly correlated with change in renal function decline. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates a decrease in podocyte number and intrarenal gene expression of podocyte-associated molecules in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis.We observed correlations between glomerular podocyte density and intrarenal expression of poclocyte-associated molecules with renal function and the degree of renal fibrosis, suggesting podocyte loss may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据