4.3 Article

Metabolic syndrome: Comparison of the two commonly used animal models

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1018-1022

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.218

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The etiology of the metabolic syndrome (MS) includes both genetic and environmental factors. The two most commonly studied animal models of the MS are the high-sucrose diet given to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and high-fructose diet given to Sprague Dawley rats (SDRs). This study compares between these two models. METHODS The two rat strains were examined; within each group, the rats were assigned to either the high-sugar diet (SDRs with fructose-enriched diet and SHRs with sucrose-enriched diet) or standard rat chow (control group). The rats were followed for 7 weeks. The main MS components (obesity, hypertension, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia) were measured. RESULTS At baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood levels of triglycerides and insulin, as well as glucose intolerance, were significantly higher among the SHRs compared to SDRs. Following fructose enrichment, SDRs became hyperinsulinemic, hypertriglyceridemic, hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive, and insulin resistant, whereas SHRs responded to sucrose supplementation by a significant elevation in blood pressure and mild worsening of insulin resistance. Endpoint results revealed superiority of sucrose-SHR model in terms of hypertension and superiority of fructose-SDR model in terms of hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia. Both models showed similar postintervention degree of glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS The fructose-fed SDR model represents a predominantly environmentally acquired MS, whereas the SHR model is less affected by dietary intervention and better displays the predominantly genetic spontaneous appearance of the syndrome. This fundamental difference should be taken into consideration when choosing an animal model to study the MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据