4.7 Article

Splice-Site Mutations in the Axonemal Outer Dynein Arm Docking Complex Gene CCDC114 Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 88-98

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT091310]
  2. Dutch patient organization PCD Belangengroep
  3. It Krystteam (Friesland)
  4. British Heart Foundation
  5. Action Medical Research UK Clinical Training Fellowship
  6. Milena Carvajal Pro-Kartagener Foundation
  7. Action Medical Research UK
  8. Henry Smith Charity
  9. New life Foundation for Disabled Children UK
  10. Action Medical Research [1773] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V1299] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10268] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defects in motile cilia and sperm flagella cause primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), characterized by chronic airway disease, infertility, and left-right laterality disturbances, usually as a result of loss of the outer dynein arms (ODAs) that power cilia/flagella beating. Here, we identify loss-of-function mutations in CCDC114 causing PCD with laterality malformations involving complex heart defects. CCDC114 is homologous to DCC2, an ODA microtubule-docking complex component of the biflagellate alga Chlamydomonas. We show that CCDC114 localizes along the entire length of human cilia and that its deficiency causes a complete absence of ciliary ODAs, resulting in immotile cilia. Thus, CCDC114 is an essential ciliary protein required for microtubular attachment of ODAs in the axoneme. Fertility is apparently not greatly affected by CCDC114 deficiency, and qPCR shows that this may explained by low transcript expression in testis compared to ciliated respiratory epithelium. One CCDC114 mutation, c.742G>A, dating back to at least the 1400s, presents an important diagnostic and therapeutic target in the isolated Dutch Volendam population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据