4.7 Article

Mutations in DARS Cause Hypomyelination with Brain Stem and Spinal Cord Involvement and Leg Spasticity

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 774-780

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health [1K08NS060695]
  3. Myelin Disorders Bioregistry Project
  4. Mission Massimo Foundation
  5. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  6. Institute for Molecular Bioscience funds
  7. NeCTAR Genomics Virtual Lab
  8. University of Queensland Foundation Research Excellence Award
  9. ZonMw TOP [91211005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inherited white-matter disorders are a broad class of diseases for which treatment and classification are both challenging. Indeed, nearly half of the children presenting with a leukoencephalopathy remain without a specific diagnosis. Here, we report on the application of high-throughput genome and exome sequencing to a cohort of ten individuals with a leukoencephalopathy of unknown etiology and clinically characterized by hypomyelination with brain stem and spinal cord involvement and leg spasticity (HBSL), as well as the identification of compound-heterozygous and homozygous mutations in cytoplasmic aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (DARS). These mutations cause nonsynonymous changes to seven highly conserved amino acids, five of which are unchanged between yeast and man, in the DARS C-terminal lobe adjacent to, or within, the active-site pocket. Intriguingly, HBSL bears a striking resemblance to leukoencephalopathy with brain stem and spinal cord involvement and elevated lactate (LBSL), which is caused by mutations in the mitochondria-specific DARS2, suggesting that these two diseases might share a common underlying molecular pathology. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that mutations in tRNA synthetases can cause a broad range of neurologic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据