4.7 Article

Gain-of-Function Mutations in SCN11A Cause Familial Episodic Pain

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 957-966

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.09.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31230045, 81271252, 31271209, 31100597]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [LRT1006]
  3. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAI09B04]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of Ministry of Education of China [20120142120062]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB910304/02, 2012CB518006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many ion channel genes have been associated with human genetic pain disorders. Here we report two large Chinese families with autosomal-dominant episodic pain. We performed a genome-wide linkage scan with microsatellite markers after excluding mutations in three known genes (SCN9A, SCN10A, and TRPA1) that cause similar pain syndrome to our findings, and we mapped the genetic locus to a 7.81 Mb region on chromosome 3p22.3-p21.32. By using whole-exome sequencing followed by conventional Sanger sequencing, we identified two missense mutations in the gene encoding voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.9 (SCN11A): c.673C>T (p.Arg225Cys) and c.2423C>G (p.Ala808Gly) (one in each family). Each mutation showed a perfect cosegregation with the pain phenotype in the corresponding family, and neither of them was detected in 1,021 normal individuals. Both missense mutations were predicted to change a highly conserved amino acid residue of the human Na(v)1.9 channel. We expressed the two SCN11A mutants in mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and showed that both mutations enhanced the channel's electrical activities and induced hyperexcitablity of DRG neurons. Taken together, our results suggest that gain-of-function mutations in SCN11A can be causative of an autosomal-dominant episodic pain disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据