4.7 Article

Translation Initiator EIF4G1 Mutations in Familial Parkinson Disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 398-406

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.08.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. CHR de Lille, Universite Lille 2, Inserm, French Ministry [1994/, 2002/1918, 2005/1914]
  2. Association France Parkinson
  3. Fondation de France [2004-013306, 2011-00016815]
  4. Fondation de la Recherche Medicate
  5. Program for Research in Third Level Institutions (PRTLI)
  6. Italian Ministry of Health
  7. Parkinson Study Group
  8. Institute of Neurology, Tunis
  9. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  10. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
  11. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS40256, NS072187, 2R01 ES10751]
  12. Canada Excellence Research Chairs program
  13. [R01NS37167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide analysis of a multi-incident family with autosomal-dominant parkinsonism has implicated a locus on chromosomal region 3q26-q28. Linkage and disease segregation is explained by a missense mutation c.3614G>A (p.Arg1205His) in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4-gamma (EIF4G1). Subsequent sequence and genotype analysis identified EIF4G1 c.1505C>T (p.Ala502Val), c.2056G>T (p.Gly686Cys), c.3490A>C (p.Ser1164Arg), c.3589C>T (p.Arg1197Trp) and c.3614G>A (p.Arg1205His) substitutions in affected subjects with familial parkinsonism and idiopathic Lewy body disease but not in control subjects. Despite different countries of origin, persons with EIF4G1 c.1505C>T (p.Ala502Val) or c.3614G>A (p.Arg1205His) mutations appear to share haplotypes consistent with ancestral founders. eIF4G1 p.Ala502Val and p.Arg1205His disrupt eIF4E or eIF3E binding, although the wild-type protein does not, and render mutant cells more vulnerable to reactive oxidative species. EIF4G1 mutations implicate mRNA translation initiation in familial parkinsonism and highlight a convergent pathway for monogenic, toxin and perhaps virally-induced Parkinson disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据