4.7 Article

Autosomal-Dominant Distal Myopathy Associated with a Recurrent Missense Mutation in the Gene Encoding the Nuclear Matrix Protein, Matrin 3

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 511-518

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Aachen University of Technology
  3. START program of the Faculty Of Medicine of Aachen University of Technology
  4. Doktor Robert Pfleger-Stiftung
  5. Maximilian May-Stiftung
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science
  8. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research BIOMAT
  9. Faculty of Medicine of Aachen University of Technology
  10. Medical Research Council [G0601943B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distal myopathies represent a heterogeneous group of inherited skeletal muscle disorders. One type of adult-onset, progressive autosomal-dominant distal myopathy, frequently associated with dysphagia and dysphonia (vocal cord and pharyngeal weakness with distal myopathy [VCPDM]), has been mapped to chromosome 5q31 in a North American pedigree. Here, we report the identification of a second large VCPDM family of Bulgarian descent and fine mapping of the critical interval. Sequencing of positional candidate genes revealed precisely the same nonconservative S85C missense mutation affecting an interspecies conserved residue in the MATR3 gene in both families. MATR3 is expressed in skeletal muscle and encodes matrin 3, a component of the nuclear matrix, which is a proteinaceous network that extends throughout the nucleus. Different disease related haplotype signatures in the two families provided evidence that two independent mutational events at the same position in MATR3 cause VCPDM. Our data establish proof of principle that the nuclear matrix is crucial for normal skeletal muscle structure and function and put VCPDM on the growing list of monogenic disorders associated with the nuclear proteome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据