4.7 Article

PRKCA: A Positional Candidate Gene for Body Mass Index and Asthma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 87-96

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.06.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01 HL075419, U01 HL65899, P01 HI083069, R01 HL 086601, T32 HL07427, K01 HL04370, R37 HL66289]
  2. NHGRI of the NIH [K23 HG3983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asthma incidence and prevalence are higher in obese individuals. A potential mechanistic basis for this relationship is pleiotropy. We hypothesized that significant linkage and candidate-gene association would be found for body mass index (BMI) in a population ascertained on asthma affection status. Linkage analysis for BMI was performed on 657 subjects in eight Costa Rican families enrolled in a study of asthma. Family-based association studies were conducted for BMI with SNPs within a positional candidate gene, PRKCA. SNPs within PRKCA were also tested for association with asthma. Association studies were conducted in 415 Costa Rican parent-child trios and 493 trios participating in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP). Although only modest evidence of linkage for BMI was obtained for the whole cohort, significant linkage was noted for BMI in females on chromosome 17q (peak LOD = 3.39). Four SNPs in a candidate gene in this region (PRKCA) had unadjusted association p values <0.05 for BMI in both cohorts, with the joint p value for two SNPs remaining significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (rs228883 and rs1005651, joint p values = 9.5 x 10(-5) and 5.6 x 10(-5)). Similarly, eight SNPs had unadjusted association p values <0.05 for asthma in both populations, with one SNP remaining significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (rs11079657, joint p value = 2.6 x 10(-5)). PRKCA is a pleiotropic locus that is associated with both BMI and asthma and that has been identified via linkage analysis of BMI in a population ascertained on asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据