4.7 Article

Genome-wide Insights into the Patterns and Determinants of Fine-Scale Population Structure in Humans

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 641-650

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 GM078105]
  2. Sloan Research Fellowship in Computational Biology
  3. National Human Genome Research Institute Interdisciplinary Training in Genomic Sciences [HG00035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying genomic patterns of human population structure provides important insights into human evolutionary history and the relationship among populations, and it has significant practical implications for disease-gene mapping. Here we describe a principal component (PC)-based approach to Studying intracontinental population structure in humans, identify the underlying markers mediating the observed patterns of fine-scale population structure, and infer the predominating evolutionary forces shaping local population structure. We applied this methodology to a data set of 650K SNPs genotyped in 944 unrelated individuals from 52 populations and demonstrate that, although typical PC analyses focus on the top axes of variation, substantial information about population structure is contained in lower-ranked PCs. We identified 18 significant PCs, some of which distinguish individual populations. In addition to visually representing sample clusters in PC biplots, we estimated the set of all SNPs significantly correlated with each of the most informative axes of variation. These polymorphisms, unlike ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), constitute a much larger set of loci that drive genomic signatures of population structure. The genome-wide distribution of these significantly correlated markers can largely be accounted for by the stochastic effects of genetic drift, although significant clustering does Occur in genomic regions that have been previously implicated as targets of recent adaptive evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据