4.7 Article

A powerful and flexible multilocus association test for quantitative traits

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 386-397

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.10.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA076404, R29 CA076404, R37 CA076404, CA76404] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG003618, HG003618] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM074909, T32 GM074909] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Association mapping of complex traits typically employs tagSNP genotype data to identify a trait locus within a region of interest. However, considerable debate exists regarding the most powerful strategy for utilizing such tagSNP data for inference. A popular approach tests each tagSNP within the region individually, but such tests could lose power as a result of incomplete linkage disequilibrium between the genotyped tagSNP and the trait locus. Alternatively, one can jointly test all tagSNPs simultaneously within the region (by using genotypes or haplotypes), but such multivariate tests have large degrees of freedom that can also compromise power. Here, we consider a semiparametric model for quantitative-trait mapping that uses genetic information from multiple tagSNPs simultaneously in analysis but produces a test statistic with reduced degrees of freedom compared to existing multivariate approaches. We fit this model by using a dimension-reducing technique called least-squares kernel machines, which we show is identical to analysis using a specific linear mixed model (which we can fit by using standard software packages like SAS and R). Using simulated SNP data based on real data from the International HapMap Project, we demonstrate that our approach often has superior performance for association mapping of quantitative traits compared to the popular approach of single-tagSNP testing. Our approach is also flexible, because it allows easy modeling of covariates and, if interest exists, high-dimensional interactions among tagSNPs and environmental predictors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据