4.4 Review

A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae

期刊

TAXON
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 1159-1181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tax.574010

关键词

biogeography; chloroplast DNA; chromosome evolution; ndhF; phylogeny; Solanaceae; trnLF

资金

  1. NSF [BSR-9107827, DEB-9509804, DEB-9727025, DEB-0235339, DEB-0316614]
  2. Egyptian Government Scientific Channel Fellowship
  3. University of Peurto Rico Presidential Scholarship
  4. U. Colorado Dept. of EPOB
  5. UW Dept. of Botany
  6. American Society of Plant Taxonomists
  7. UW McNair Scholarship
  8. Howard Hughes Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A phylogeny of Solanaceae is presented based on the chloroplast DNA regions ndhF and trnLF. With 89 genera and 190 species included, this represents a nearly comprehensive genus-level sampling and provides a framework phylogeny for the entire family that helps integrate many previously-published phylogenetic studies within Solanaceae. The four genera comprising the family Goetzeaceae and the monotypic families Duckeodendraceae, Nolanaceae, and Sclerophylaceae, often recognized in traditional classifications, are shown to be included in Solanaceae. The current results corroborate previous studies that identify a monophyletic subfamily Solanoideae and the more inclusive x = 12 clade, which includes Nicotiana and the Australian tribe Anthocercideae. These results also provide greater resolution among lineages within solanoideae, confirming Jaltomata as sister to Solanum and identifying a clade comprised primarily of tribes Capsiceae (Capsicum and Lycianthes) and Physaleae. Stronger evidence also is provided for the inclusion of Capsicum within a paraphyletic Lycianthes. Solanaceae are a predominantly New World group, with several lineages represented on other continents. Apart from events within Solanum (for which sampling in this study is inadequate for biogeographic interpretations) the Old World representations of Solanaceae can be accounted for by eight or nine dispersal events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据