4.3 Article

A highly sensitive immunoassay for interleukin-6 in dried blood spots

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 863-865

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22324

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-1027687]
  2. Network on Biological Risk [R24AG037898]
  3. UCS/UCLA Center on Biodemography and Population Health [P30AG017265]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1027687] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is associated with the production of C-reactive protein, the acute phase response, and chronic low-grade inflammation. In this report, we describe and validate a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantifying IL-6 at low concentrations in samples of capillary whole blood collected from a simple finger stick and dried on filter paper (dried blood spots, DBS). Methods: A commercially available ELISA for IL-6 was modified to develop a protocol for the quantification of IL-6 in DBS samples. Procedures for sample elution and incubation were optimized for precision, reliability, accuracy, and lower limit of detection using small volumes of DBS. A set of 46 matched serum/DBS samples were used to evaluate agreement between serum and DBS results. Results: The protocol demonstrated acceptable levels of precision, reliability, accuracy, and agreement with serum-based results. The lower limit of detection was sufficiently low to measure levels of IL-6 associated with both chronic, low-grade inflammation, and acute increases in inflammatory activity. Conclusions: This protocol adds to the growing panel of analytes validated for quantification in DBS samples and should facilitate future research on the causes and consequences of inflammation in diverse non-clinical settings. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2012. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据