4.3 Article

Growth and Market Integration in Amazonia: A Comparison of Growth Indicators Between Shuar, Shiwiar, and Nonindigenous School Children

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 161-171

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20838

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [BNS91.57-449]
  2. UCSB Center for Evolutionary Psychology [5DPI0000516-04]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  4. Fulbright Foundation
  5. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  6. UO Anthropology Department and Office of Research Grants
  7. Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship
  8. UO Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences Research Grants
  9. Ministerio de Salud Pdblica de Morona Santiago, Ecuador

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe and compare the growth of three groups of juveniles, aged 0-18, who experience different degrees of market integration and acculturation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. These include 1,384 indigenous Shuar from the Upano Valley of Ecuador and surrounding areas, 570 nonindigenous colono (or colonist) children from the same area, and 42 Shiwiar from the interior of Ecuador. We use differences between these populations in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) z-scores to assess the effects of changing subsistence patterns on Shuar growth and nutrition. Although, for all three groups, mean height-for-age z-scores were negative, Shuar z-scores were significantly lower than either colono or Shiwiar z-scores. Mean weight-for-age z-scores were also negative for Shuar and colono juveniles, while mean BMI-for-age and weight-for-height z-scores were greater than zero for all three groups. Using NHANES standards, 41% of male and 38% of female Shuar were classified as stunted, versus 16% of male and 20% of female colonos. Compared to Shuar, colonos were three times less likely to be stunted (OR = 0.33, P < 0.01) and Shiwiar were eight times less likely to be stunted (OR = 0.13, P = 0.01). These differences suggest that changes in diet have negatively affected Shuar growth and nutrition. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21:161-171, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据