4.6 Article

Monosomal karyotype is an independent predictor of survival in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 89, 期 10, 页码 E163-E168

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23801

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds [81070403, 81270585, 81200349]
  2. Tianjin Key Natural Science Funds [12JCZDJC23900]
  3. National Public Health Grand Research Foundation [201202017]
  4. SRFDP [20121106130005]
  5. NIHR Biomedical Research Center fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A monosomal karyotype (MK) correlates with poor survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, although whether this is also the case in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains controversial. Some studies report a correlation between a MK and a worse survival, whereas others claim that this correlation arises because of a confounding effect between a MK and a complex karyotype (CK). To address this question, we analyzed the clinical data and karyotypes of 610 adults with MDS. A MK was identified in 60 patients, of whom 55 (92%) also fulfilled the criteria for a CK. Conversely, a CK was found in 85 patients, of whom 55 (65%) also had a MK. To determine the impact of a MK on survival, 464 patients who received nonintensive therapies for MDS were analyzed separately. Patients with a MK demonstrated worse survival than those without a MK in univariate analyses (median, 8 months [95% CI, 3-12 months] versus 83 months [63-103 months]; P<0.001). This effect was observed predominately in the cohorts of higher-risk patients according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System and the World Health Organization Prognostic Scoring System (HR [hazard ratio] 3.94 [1.97-7.89]; P<0.001 and 4.937 [2.45-9.94]; P<0.001, respectively) and surpassed the impact of a CK in the final survival models. Our data suggest that the addition of MK as a binary variable could improve the predictive accuracy of current models to estimate the survival of patients with MDS. Am. J. Hematol. 89:E163-E168, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据