4.6 Article

A conditioning platform based on fludarabine, busulfan, and 2 days of rabbit antithymocyte globulin results in promising results in patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation from both matched and mismatched unrelated donor

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 83-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23592

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conditioning regimen including fludarabine, intravenous busulfan (Bx), and 5 mg/kg total dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) (FBx-ATG) results in low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors (MUD). However, whether this platform produces similar results in the setting of one mismatch unrelated donor (MMUD) Allo-HSCT is not known. We retrospectively analyzed patients aged less than 65 years who were diagnosed with hematological malignancies and received FBx-ATG regimen prior to Allo-HSCT from MUD (N=74) or MMUD (N=40). We compared outcome of MUD versus MMUD patients. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (MUD: 34% vs. MMUD: 35%, P=0.918), but MMUD patients developed more grade III-IV acute GVHD (MUD: 5% vs. MMUD: 15%, P=0.016). The cumulative incidences of overall chronic GVHD (MUD: 33% vs. MMUD: 22%, P=0.088) and extensive chronic GVHD (MUD: 20% vs. MMUD: 19%, P=0.594) were comparable. One-year NRM was similar in both groups (MUD: 16% vs. MMUD: 14%, P=0.292); similarly, progression-free survival (MUD: 59% vs. MMUD: 55%, P=0.476) and overall survival (MUD: 63% vs. MMUD: 61%, P=0.762) were not different between both groups. With a median follow up of 24 months, 35 of 74 MUD patients (47%) and 19 of 40 MMUD patients (48%) were free of both disease progression and immunosuppressive treatment. We conclude that the FBx-ATG regimen results in low incidences of NRM and GVHD in both MUD and the MMUD recipients. Am. J. Hematol. 89:83-87, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据