4.6 Article

Changes in serum-free light chain rather than intact monoclonal immunoglobulin levels predicts outcome following therapy in primary amyloidosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 251-255

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21948

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hematologic Malignancies Program
  2. Paul Calabresi K12
  3. National Cancer Institute [CA62242, CA93842, CA10080]
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current response criteria for light-chain amyloidosis (AL) relegate FLC response to a subsidiary status relative to serum M-protein response. Given that light chains form the substrate for amyloid fibril formation, we hypothesized that changes in FLC might better predict outcome compared to changes in intact immunoglobulin levels. Two patient cohorts were studied, 347 patients who underwent an autologous stem-cell transplant (SCT) and 96 patients treated with melphalan/dexamethasone. We identified the lowest value following therapy for intact serum M-protein and the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC (FLC-diff). We first examined the relative contribution of M-protein and FLC-diff on the overall survival (OS), and found that FLC reduction, rather than M-protein reduction, significantly impacted OS. The median OS was not reached among those with a 50% decrease in FLC-diff compared to 20 months for the remainder. On regression analysis, a 90% reduction in FLC-diff following SCT best predicted being alive at 3 or 5 years. The median OS among those with a 90% decrease was not reached compared to 37.4 months for the rest P < 0.001. The current study supports the notion that FLC response is a more useful measure of hematological response than M-protein response. It also highlights the importance of achieving at least a 90% reduction in the FLC-diff to improve the outcome of patients with light-chain AL. Am. J. Hematol. 86:251-255, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据