4.5 Article

The Effects of Age and Estrogen on Stress Responsivity in Older Women

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 734-743

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31825c0a14

关键词

Aging; estrogen; menopause; stress

资金

  1. NARSAD [NIA R01 AG021476, NIA K01 AG 030380, NCRR-00109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The current study examined whether age after menopause impacted the effect of estradiol (E2) on mood after a psychosocial stress manipulation. Background: Previous studies have shown that E2 improves mood in women around the menopause transition but does not improve mood for older postmenopausal women. We have previously shown that E2 treatment in nondepressed women resulted in increased negative mood after psychosocial stress. Design: Participants were 22 postmenopausal women placed on either oral placebo or 17 beta-estradiol (1 mg/day for 1 month, then 2 mg/day for 2 months). Method: At the end of the 3-month treatment phase, the participants performed the Trier Social Stress Test followed by mood ratings. To examine the effects of age on the estrogen-stress interaction, we performed a median split on age and created four groups of participants: younger-placebo (mean age: 55.5 years), younger-E2 (mean age: 55.5 years), older-placebo (mean age: 73.0 years), and older-E2 (mean age: 76.8 years). Results: The results showed that both older and younger E2-treated participants exhibited a significant and similar increase in negative mood after psychosocial stress compared with placebo-treated women. Conclusions: These results suggest that E2 may play a significant role in modulating emotional reactivity to stressful events and that this effect persists in older women. Furthermore, responsivity to E2 effects on emotional processing appears to be intact even years after menopause in contrast with other cognitive and behavioral effects of E2, which may be limited to the early postmenopausal years. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 20:734-743)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据