4.7 Article

Association of Higher DEFB4 Genomic Copy Number With Crohn's Disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 354-359

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.582

关键词

-

资金

  1. New Zealand Lotteries Health [245994]
  2. Health Research Council of New Zealand [08-075C]
  3. Sir Charles Hercus Health Research [08-068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Human beta-defensin 2 (hBD-2 or DEFB4) is a highly inducible, antimicrobial peptide, which may have an important role in the innate immune response at epithelial surfaces. Genomic copy number of DEFB4 is polymorphic, with most individuals possessing 3-5 copies. Increased DEFB4 copy number is a susceptibility factor for psoriasis, whereas a single study in a Crohn's disease (CD) cohort reported that decreased DEFB4 copy number is associated with colonic inflammation. Here, we analyze association of DEFB4 copy number with CD in a New Zealand case-control cohort of European origin. METHODS: DEFB4 gene copy number was determined using TaqMan quantitative PCR in 466 CD patients and 329 controls. DNA samples, independently genotyped for DEFB4 copy number by alternative methods, were used to validate the assay. RESULTS: Increased DEFB4 genomic copy number was seen in CD patients compared with controls. Individuals with > 4 copies had a significantly higher risk of developing CD than those with < 4 copies (odds ratio 1.54; 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.09, P = 5e-05). DEFB4 genomic copy number did not differ by disease location within the CD cohort (P = 0.948), nor did analysis of CD patients who had undergone surgery detect association of decreased DEFB4 genomic copy number (< 4) in colonic CD compared with ileal CD (P = 0.120). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that elevated DEFB4 copy number is a risk factor for CD (irrespective of intestinal location), and challenge previous data supporting positive association of lower DEFB4 genomic copy number with colonic CD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据