4.7 Article

Suspected Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Mortality Risk in a Population-Based Cohort Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 103, 期 9, 页码 2263-2271

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02034.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH NRSA [T32 DK07202]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [M01 RR000827]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. General Clinical Research Center at UCSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Case series suggest that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The current study compared the survival of subjects with and without suspected NAFLD in a population-based cohort, and placed the finding in the context of previously published case series. METHODS: Primary analysis assessed mortality for NHANES-III participants with and without suspected NAFLD using the National Death Index. Suspected NAFLD was based upon unexplained ALT elevation. The Olmsted County and Cleveland Clinic case series were also used for comparison. Survivals were compared using Proportional Hazards Model and direct age standardization. RESULTS: The NHANES cohort included 980 with and 6,594 subjects without suspected NAFLD. Over a mean of 8.7 yr, suspected NAFLD had a hazards ratio of 1.37 (95% Cl 0.98-1.91) for all-cause mortality. In the 45-54 age group, suspected NAFLD had significantly higher all-cause (4.40 95% Cl 1.27-13.23) and cardiovascular mortality (8.15, 95% Cl 2.00-33.20) after adjusting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors. The age-standardized rate per 10,000 per year was 129 (95% C1 118-140) for the NHANES non-NAFLD cohort, 154 (95% Cl 116-198) for the NHANES suspected NAFLD cohort, 214 (95% Cl 157-279) for the Olmsted County series, and 426 (95% Cl 298-573) for the Cleveland Clinic series. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of mortality risk in NAFLD depends on the setting and method of ascertainment. Suspected NAFLD in the 45-54 age group is a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular death and warrants further cardiovascular risk management guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据