4.7 Article

Insulin resistance and diabetes increase fibrosis in the liver of patients with genotype 1 HCV infection

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 1136-1144

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01813.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic factors may affect the course of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Insulin resistance (IR) determines steatosis, but its direct role in affecting progression of hepatic fibrosis is less clear. We aimed to assess whether increasing degrees of IR, up to overt diabetes, are linked to steatosis and higher stages of fibrosis in patients with CHC resulting from genotype 1 HCV (G1-HCV). METHODS: Two hundred one consecutive patients with G1-HCV infection were evaluated by liver biopsy and anthropometric and metabolic measurements, including IR, by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Nondiabetic patients were defined as insulin resistant if HOMA-IR was > 2.7. All biopsies were scored by one pathologist for staging and grading (Scheuer), and graded for steatosis. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were noninsulin resistant (group 1), 76 were insulin resistant without diabetes (group 2), and 29 were diabetic (group 3). At multivariate analysis, fibrosis of >= 3 was independently associated with high necroinflammatory activity (odds ratio [OR] 2.994, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.422-6.098), low platelets (OR 0.994, 95% CI 0.981-0.999), low cholesterol (OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.976-0.998), high ferritin (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.004), and a high prevalence of IR (OR 2.692, 95% CI 1.463-4.954). Diabetic patients were twice as likely to have severe fibrosis (60%) than those with IR but no diabetes (30%) (P=0.006). The degree of steatosis and that of fibrosis were weakly associated with each other (P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with CHC resulting from G1-HCV, IR and overt diabetes are major determinants of advanced fibrosis, regardless of the degree of steatosis, mainly in the presence of severe necroinflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据