4.6 Article

Universal Influenza Vaccines: Progress in Achieving Broad Cross-Protection In Vivo

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 187, 期 12, 页码 2603-2614

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy145

关键词

antibodies; cross-protection; influenza; influenza vaccines; T cells; universal influenza vaccines; vaccines; viral antibodies

资金

  1. US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite all we have learned since 1918 about influenza virus and immunity, available influenza vaccines remain inadequate to control outbreaks of unexpected strains. Universal vaccines not requiring strain matching would be a major improvement. Their composition would be independent of predicting circulating viruses and thus potentially effective against unexpected drift or pandemic strains. This commentary explores progress with candidate universal vaccines based on various target antigens. Candidates include vaccines based on conserved viral proteins such as nucleoprotein and matrix, on the conserved hemagglutinin (HA) stem, and various combinations. Discussion covers the differing evidence for each candidate vaccine demonstrating protection in animals against influenza viruses of widely divergent HA subtypes and groups; durability of protection; routes of administration, including mucosal, providing local immunity; and reduction of transmission. Human trials of some candidate universal vaccines have been completed or are underway. Interestingly, the HA stem, like nucleoprotein and matrix, induces immunity that permits some virus replication and emergence of escape mutants fit enough to cause disease. Vaccination with multiple target antigens will thus have advantages over use of single antigens. Ultimately, a universal vaccine providing long-term protection against all influenza virus strains might contribute to pandemic control and routine vaccination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据