4.6 Article

Dietary Carbohydrates, Refined Grains, Glycemic Load, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese Adults

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 178, 期 10, 页码 1542-1549

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt178

关键词

carbohydrates; Chinese; coronary heart disease; glycemic load; refined grains

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL079123, R37CA070867, R01CA082729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential long-term association between carbohydrate intake and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains unclear, especially among populations who habitually have high-carbohydrate diets. We prospectively examined intakes of carbohydrates and staple grains as well as glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to CHD among 117,366 Chinese women and men (4074 years of age) without history of diabetes, CHD, stroke, or cancer at baseline in Shanghai, China. Diet was assessed using validated food frequency questionnaires. Incident CHD cases were ascertained during follow-ups (in women, the mean was 9.8 years and in men, the mean was 5.4 years) and confirmed by medical records. Carbohydrate intake accounted for 67.5 of the total energy intake in women and 68.5 in men. Seventy percent of total carbohydrates came from white rice and 17 were from refined wheat products. Positive associations between carbohydrate intakess and CHD were found in both sexes (all P for heterogeneity 0.35). The combined multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for the lowest to highest quartiles of carbohydrate intake, respectively, were 1.00, 1.38, 2.03, and 2.88 (95 confidence interval: 1.44, 5.78; P for trend 0.001). The combined hazard ratios comparing the highest quartile with the lowest were 1.80 (95 confidence interval: 1.01, 3.17) for refined grains and 1.87 (95 confidence interval: 1.00, 3.53) for glycemic load (both P for trend 0.03). High carbohydrate intake, mainly from refined grains, is associated with increased CHD risk in Chinese adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据