4.6 Article

A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 178, 期 9, 页码 1505-1512

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt133

关键词

incidence; influenza; measles; reproduction number; SARS; smallpox; software

资金

  1. United Kingdom Medical Research Council methodology project [G0800596]
  2. FP7 European Management Platform for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease Entities project
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study program
  4. Research Council United Kingdom
  5. Royal Society
  6. Medical Research Council [G0800596, MR/K010174/1, MR/K010174/1B, G0600719B] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MR/K010174/1, G0800596] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantification of transmissibility during epidemics is essential to designing and adjusting public health responses. Transmissibility can be measured by the reproduction number R, the average number of secondary cases caused by an infected individual. Several methods have been proposed to estimate R over the course of an epidemic; however, they are usually difficult to implement for people without a strong background in statistical modeling. Here, we present a ready-to-use tool for estimating R from incidence time series, which is implemented in popular software including Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington). This tool produces novel, statistically robust analytical estimates of R and incorporates uncertainty in the distribution of the serial interval (the time between the onset of symptoms in a primary case and the onset of symptoms in secondary cases). We applied the method to 5 historical outbreaks; the resulting estimates of R are consistent with those presented in the literature. This tool should help epidemiologists quantify temporal changes in the transmission intensity of future epidemics by using surveillance data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据