4.6 Article

20/20-Alcohol and Age-related Macular Degeneration: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 176, 期 4, 页码 289-298

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws004

关键词

aging; alcohol drinking; macular degeneration

资金

  1. VicHealth
  2. Cancer Council Victoria
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [209057, 251533, 396414]
  4. Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia
  5. American Health Assistance Foundation
  6. John Reid Charitable Trust
  7. Perpetual Trustees
  8. Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
  9. NHMRC
  10. Wagstaff Fellowship
  11. Hugh Noel Puckle Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little evidence exists regarding associations between age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and moderate alcohol consumption, patterns of consumption, or different types of alcoholic beverage. The authors examined associations between AMD prevalence and alcohol intake using 20,963 participants from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study aged 4069 years at baseline (19901994). Participants alcohol consumption was determined from a structured interview at baseline. At follow-up from 2003 to 2007, digital macula photographs of both eyes were taken and evaluated for early and late AMD signs. Drinking more than 20 g of alcohol per day was associated with an approximate 20 increase in the odds of early AMD (odds ratio 1.21, 95 confidence interval: 1.06, 1.38; P 0.004) when compared with those who reported no alcohol intake at baseline, having adjusted for sex, age, smoking, country of birth, education, physical activity, and energy from food. This positive association was apparent for wine, beer, and spirits. The estimates were similar for both sexes. The odds ratio for those drinking more than 20 g of alcohol per day for late AMD was 1.44 (95 confidence interval: 0.85, 2.45; P 0.17). These results show a modest association between alcohol consumption and increased AMD risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据