4.6 Article

Assessment of Autoantibodies to Meningioma in a Population-based Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 177, 期 1, 页码 75-83

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws221

关键词

autoantibodies; brain neoplasms; genetics; immunologic factors; meningioma; neurosurgery; risk factors

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health R01 [CA109468, CA109461, CA109745, CA108473, CA109475, CA151933]
  2. Brain Science Foundation
  3. Meningioma Mommas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meningioma is an intracranial tumor with few confirmed risk factors. Recent research points to an impact on meningioma risk from factors related to immune function and development, such as allergy, immunoglobulin E, and Varicella infection status. To further explore an association with immune function, the authors assessed individual seroreactivity to meningioma tumor-associated antigens among participants enrolled in a multicenter, population-based US case-control study of meningioma (20062009). Serum samples from cases (n 349) and controls (n 348) were screened for autoantibody reactivity to 3 proteins identified in previous studies: enolase 1 (ENO1), NK-tumor recognition protein (NKTR), and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NUMA1). Case-control differences were not strong overall (adjusted odds ratio (OR)(ENO1 (continuous)) 1.1, 95 confidence interval (CI): 0.6, 1.9 (P-trend 0.3); adjusted ORNKTR (continuous) 1.3, 95 CI: 0.7, 2.4 (P-trend 0.02); and adjusted ORNUMA1 (continuous) 1.1, 95 CI: 0.7, 1.8 (P-trend 0.06)); however, antibodies to NKTR and NUMA1 were detected at higher levels in cases than in controls, particularly among men (for men, adjusted ORENO1 (continuous) 1.6, 95 CI: 0.5, 4.7 (P-trend 0.24); adjusted ORNKTR (continuous) 4.3, 95 CI: 1.2, 15 (P-trend 0.009); and adjusted ORNUMA1 (continuous) 3.6, 95 CI: 1.1, 11 (P-trend 0.006)). These results indicate that men with meningioma commonly react with a serologic antimeningioma response; if supported by further research, this finding suggests a distinctive etiology for meningioma in men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据