4.6 Article

Use of Imputed Population-based Cancer Registry Data as a Method of Accounting for Missing Information: Application to Estrogen Receptor Status for Breast Cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 176, 期 4, 页码 347-356

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr512

关键词

breast neoplasms; imputation; incidence; missing data; receptors; estrogen

资金

  1. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program provides a rich source of data stratified according to tumor biomarkers that play an important role in cancer surveillance research. These data are useful for analyzing trends in cancer incidence and survival. These tumor markers, however, are often prone to missing observations. To address the problem of missing data, the authors employed sequential regression multivariate imputation for breast cancer variables, with a particular focus on estrogen receptor status, using data from 13 SEER registries covering the period 19922007. In this paper, they present an approach to accounting for missing information through the creation of imputed data sets that can be analyzed using existing software (e.g., SEERStat) developed for analyzing cancer registry data. Bias in age-adjusted trends in female breast cancer incidence is shown graphically before and after imputation of estrogen receptor status, stratified by age and race. The imputed data set will be made available in SEERStat (http://seer.cancer.gov/analysis/index.html) to facilitate accurate estimation of breast cancer incidence trends. To ensure that the imputed data set is used correctly, the authors provide detailed, step-by-step instructions for conducting analyses. This is the first time that a nationally representative, population-based cancer registry data set has been imputed and made available to researchers for conducting a variety of analyses of breast cancer incidence trends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据