4.6 Article

A Simple Unified Approach for Estimating Natural Direct and Indirect Effects

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 176, 期 3, 页码 190-195

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr525

关键词

causal inference; marginal structural models; mediation

资金

  1. Commission of Social Inequality in Cancer [SU08004]
  2. IAP research network from the Belgian government (Belgian Science Policy) [P06/03]
  3. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT vlaanderen)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important problem within both epidemiology and many social sciences is to break down the effect of a given treatment into different causal pathways and to quantify the importance of each pathway. Formal mediation analysis based on counterfactuals is a key tool when addressing this problem. During the last decade, the theoretical framework for mediation analysis has been greatly extended to enable the use of arbitrary statistical models for outcome and mediator. However, the researcher attempting to use these techniques in practice will often find implementation a daunting task, as it tends to require special statistical programming. In this paper, the authors introduce a simple procedure based on marginal structural models that directly parameterize the natural direct and indirect effects of interest. It tends to produce more parsimonious results than current techniques, greatly simplifies testing for the presence of a direct or an indirect effect, and has the advantage that it can be conducted in standard software. However, its simplicity comes at the price of relying on correct specification of models for the distribution of mediator (and exposure) and accepting some loss of precision compared with more complex methods. Web Appendixes 1 and 2, which are posted on the Journals Web site (http://aje.oupjournals.org/), contain implementation examples in SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) and R language (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据