4.6 Article

Nutrients and Genetic Variation Involved in One-Carbon Metabolism and Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk: A Population-based Case-Control Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 174, 期 7, 页码 816-827

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr190

关键词

case-control studies; diet; folic acid; Hodgkin disease; vitamins

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA069266-01A1, T32 CA-009001-35, K07 CA115687]
  2. American Institute for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutritional and genetic determinants of the one-carbon metabolism pathway have been related to risk of malignant lymphomas, but little is known about their associations with Hodgkin lymphoma risk specifically. The authors examined nutrient intake (folate, vitamin B-2, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, methionine) and multivitamin use among 497 Hodgkin lymphoma patients and 638 population-based controls (Massachusetts and Connecticut, 1997-2000), and genetic variation (MTHFR 677C > T, MTHFR 1298A > C, MTR 2756A > G, SHMT1 1420C > T, TYMS 1494del6) and gene-diet interactions in a subset. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate multivariable odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Hodgkin lymphoma risk was not associated with total nutrient intake or intake from food alone (excluding supplements). Multivitamin use (odds ratio (OR) = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.96), total vitamin B-6 (ORquartile 4 vs. 1 = 1.62) (P-trend = 0.03), and total vitamin B-12 (ORquartile 4 vs. 1 = 1.75) (P-trend = 0.02) intakes were positively associated with risk of Epstein-Barr virus-negative, but not -positive, disease. The 5 genetic variants were not significantly associated with Hodgkin lymphoma risk; no significant gene-diet interactions were observed after Bonferroni correction. Study findings do not support a strong role for nutrients and genetic variation in the one-carbon metabolism pathway in susceptibility to Hodgkin lymphoma. Associations between diet and risk of Epstein-Barr virus-negative disease require confirmation in other populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据