4.6 Article

Milk Intake in Early Life and Risk of Advanced Prostate Cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 175, 期 2, 页码 144-153

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr289

关键词

adolescent; diet; Iceland; milk; prostatic neoplasms; risk factors

资金

  1. Framfor (Progress), an Icelandic organization
  2. Icelandic Cancer Society
  3. Nordic Health-Whole Grain Food (HELGA)
  4. US National Institutes of Health [NIH 5 T32 CA09001-35]
  5. American Institute for Cancer Research
  6. US National Institute on Aging [N01-AG-1-2100]
  7. National Institute on Aging
  8. Icelandic Heart Association
  9. Althingi (the Icelandic Parliament)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors investigated whether early-life residency in certain areas of Iceland marked by distinct differences in milk intake was associated with risk of prostate cancer in a population-based cohort of 8,894 men born between 1907 and 1935. Through linkage to cancer and mortality registers, the men were followed for prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality from study entry (in waves from 1967 to 1987) through 2009. In 2002-2006, a subgroup of 2,268 participants reported their milk intake in early, mid-, and current life. During a mean follow-up period of 24.3 years, 1,123 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, including 371 with advanced disease (stage 3 or higher or prostate cancer death). Compared with early-life residency in the capital area, rural residency in the first 20 years of life was marginally associated with increased risk of advanced prostate cancer (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97, 1.73), particularly among men born before 1920 (hazard ratio = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.56). Daily milk consumption in adolescence (vs. less than daily), but not in midlife or currently, was associated with a 3.2-fold risk of advanced prostate cancer (95% CI: 1.25, 8.28). These data suggest that frequent milk intake in adolescence increases risk of advanced prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据