4.6 Article

Presence of Gallstones or Kidney Stones and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 171, 期 4, 页码 447-454

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp411

关键词

cohort studies; diabetes mellitus, type 2; gallstones; kidney calculi; insulin resistance; nephrolithiasis; obesity; risk factors

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Science [01 EA 9401]
  2. European Union [SOC 95201408 05F02]
  3. German Cancer Aid [70-2488-Ha I]
  4. European Community [SOC 98200769 05F02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that gallstones and kidney stones are associated with insulin resistance, but the relation between stone diseases and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus is not clear. Participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study (Potsdam, Germany) provided information about the presence of gallstones and kidney stones at recruitment between 1994 and 1998. On biennial questionnaires, participants reported newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus, and confirmation was obtained from treating physicians. During a mean follow-up period of 7.0 years between 1994 and 2005, 849 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were identified among 25,166 participants. After adjustment for sex, age, waist circumference, and lifestyle risk factors, persons with reported gallstones (n = 3,293) had an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (relative risk 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.68). Among the 23,817 participants with information on reported kidney stones (784 cases of incident diabetes), those who developed kidney stones (n = 2,468) were not at increased risk of diabetes in multivariable-adjusted models (relative risk = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.86, 1.27). These findings suggest that gallstones, but not kidney stones, may predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, providing physicians with an interventional opportunity to implement adequate prevention measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据