4.6 Article

Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Risk of Invasive Colon Cancer The California Teachers Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 171, 期 4, 页码 415-425

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp434

关键词

colonic neoplasms; hormone replacement therapy; lung neoplasms; parity; prospective studies; reproduction; smoking

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA 77398]
  2. California Department of Health Services [103885]
  3. National Cancer Institute [N01-PC-35136]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries [U55/CCR921930-02]
  5. [N01-PC-35139]
  6. [N02-PC-15105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results from epidemiologic studies of hormone therapy use and colon cancer risk are inconsistent. This question was investigated in the California Teachers Study (1995-2006) among 56,864 perimenopausal or postmenopausal participants under 80 years of age with no prior colorectal cancer by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Incident invasive colon cancer was diagnosed among 442 participants. Baseline-recent hormone therapy users were at 36% lower risk for colon cancer versus baseline-never users (baseline-recent users: relative risk (RR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 0.80). Results did not differ by formulation. Estimated risk was lower among baseline-recent hormone therapy users with increasing duration between 5 and 15 years of use (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.68), but the trend did not persist in the longest duration group, more than 15 years of use (RR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.92; P(trend) = 0.60). Long-term recreational physical activity, obesity, regular use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications, and daily alcohol intake did not modify these effects; baseline-recent use was more strongly associated with colon cancer risk among women with a family history of colorectal cancer (P(heterogeneity) = 0.04). Baseline-recent hormone therapy use was inversely associated with invasive colon cancer risk among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women in the California Teachers Study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据