4.6 Article

Dynamics and Control of Infections Transmitted From Person to Person Through the Environment

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 170, 期 2, 页码 257-265

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp116

关键词

communicable diseases; disease transmission; infectious; environmental medicine; environment and public health; epidemiologic methods; fomites; influenza; human; intervention studies

资金

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency
  2. US Department of Homeland Security University Programs [R83236201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The environment provides points for control of pathogens spread by food, water, hands, air, or fomites. These environmental transmission pathways require contact network formulations more realistically detailed than those based on social encounters or physical proximity. As a step toward improved assessment of environmental interventions, description of contact networks, and better use of environmental specimens to analyze transmission, an environmental infection transmission system model that describes the dynamics of human interaction with pathogens in the environment is presented. Its environmental parameters include the pathogen elimination rate, mu, and the rate humans pick up pathogens, , and deposit them, alpha. The ratio, N/mu (N equals population size), indicates whether transmission is density dependent (low ratio), frequency dependent (high ratio), or in between. Transmission through frequently touched fomites, such as doorknobs, generates frequency-dependent patterns, while transmission through thoroughly mixed air or infrequently touched fomites generates density-dependent patterns. The environmental contamination ratio, alpha/gamma, reflects total agent deposition per infection and outbreak probability, where gamma is defined as the recovery rate. These insights provide theoretical contexts to examine the role of the environment in pathogen transmission and a framework to interpret environmental data to inform environmental interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据