4.6 Article

Parkinson's Disease and Residential Exposure to Maneb and Paraquat From Agricultural Applications in the Central Valley of California

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 169, 期 8, 页码 919-926

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp006

关键词

case-control studies; fungicides; industrial; geographic information systems; herbicides; maneb; paraquat; Parkinson disease; pesticides

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES10544, U54ES12078, 5P30 ES07048]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS 038367]
  3. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program [051037]
  4. American Parkinson's Disease Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence from animal and cell models suggests that pesticides cause a neurodegenerative process leading to Parkinson's disease (PD). Human data are insufficient to support this claim for any specific pesticide, largely because of challenges in exposure assessment. The authors developed and validated an exposure assessment tool based on geographic information systems that integrated information from California Pesticide Use Reports and land-use maps to estimate historical exposure to agricultural pesticides in the residential environment. In 1998-2007, the authors enrolled 368 incident PD cases and 341 population controls from the Central Valley of California in a case-control study. They generated estimates for maneb and paraquat exposures incurred between 1974 and 1999. Exposure to both pesticides within 500 m of the home increased PD risk by 75% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 2.73). Persons aged <= 60 years at the time of diagnosis were at much higher risk when exposed to either maneb or paraquat alone (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.91, 5.70) or to both pesticides in combination (odds ratio = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.15, 15.16) in 1974-1989. This study provides evidence that exposure to a combination of maneb and paraquat increases PD risk, particularly in younger subjects and/or when exposure occurs at younger ages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据