4.6 Article

Defining Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in the Research Setting

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 170, 期 4, 页码 414-424

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp151

关键词

cohort studies; diagnostic techniques and procedures; incidence; kidney diseases

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC55015, N01-HC-55016., N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55022]
  2. National Institutes of Health [5T32-HL-00702433]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease [1R0-DK-076770-01]
  4. German Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deaths of participants and losses to follow-up pose challenges for defining outcomes in epidemiologic studies. The authors compared several definitions of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in terms of incidence, agreement, and risk factor associations. They used data from 14,873 participants in the community-based, multicenter, biracial Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (1987-1999). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was based on serum creatinine at baseline and the 3- and 9-year follow-up visits. Hospitalizations were ascertained continuously. The authors compared 4 definitions of incident CKD: 1) low eGFR (< 60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2)); 2) low and declining (>= 25%) eGFR; 3) an increase in serum creatinine (>= 0.4 mg/dL) at 3- or 9-year follow-ups; and 4) CKD-related hospitalization or death. From these definitions, they identified 1,086, 677, 457, and 163 cases, respectively. There was relatively good agreement among definitions 1-3, but definition 4 identified mostly different cases. Risk factor associations were consistent across definitions for hypertension and lipids. Diabetes showed weaker associations with definition 1 (incidence rate ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.7) than with definition 4 (incidence rate ratio = 6.3, confidence interval: 4.4, 8.9). Associations with gender differed in direction and magnitude across definitions. Case definition can impact relative risk estimates for CKD risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据