4.6 Article

Strategies for Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza Vaccination of Schoolchildren in the United States

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 170, 期 6, 页码 679-686

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp237

关键词

communicable disease control; influenza; human; influenza vaccines; mass immunization

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences MIDAS [U01-GM070749]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01-AI32042]
  3. MedImmune (Gaithersburg, Maryland)
  4. College Scientists (ARCS) Foundation Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccinating school-aged children against influenza can reduce age-specific and population-level illness attack rates. Using a stochastic simulation model of influenza transmission, the authors assessed strategies for vaccinating children in the United States, varying the vaccine type, coverage level, and reproductive number R (average number of secondary cases produced by a typical primary case). Results indicated that vaccinating children can substantially reduce population-level illness attack rates over a wide range of scenarios. The greatest absolute reduction in influenza illness cases per season occurred at R values ranging from 1.2 to 1.6 for a given vaccine coverage level. The indirect, total, and overall effects of vaccinating children were strong when transmission intensity was low to intermediate. The indirect effects declined rapidly as transmission intensity increased. In a mild influenza season (R = 1.1), approximately 19 million influenza cases could be prevented by vaccinating 70% of children. At most, nearly 100 million cases of influenza illness could be prevented, depending on the proportion of children vaccinated and the transmission intensity. Given the current worldwide threat of novel influenza A (H1N1), with an estimated R of 1.4-1.6, health officials should consider strategies for vaccinating children against novel influenza A (H1N1) as well as seasonal influenza.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据