4.6 Article

Body mass index in adolescence in relation to cause-specific mortality: A follow-up of 230,000 Norwegian adolescents

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 168, 期 1, 页码 30-37

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn096

关键词

adolescent; body mass index; cause of death; follow-up studies; mortality; Norway; obesity

资金

  1. MRC [G0600705] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of obesity in childhood and adolescence has increased worldwide. Long-term effects of adolescent obesity on cause-specific mortality are not well specified. The authors studied 227,000 adolescents (aged 14-19 years) measured (height and weight) in Norwegian health surveys in 1963-1975. During follow-up (8 million person-years), 9,650 deaths were observed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare cause-specific mortality among individuals whose baseline body mass index (BMI) was below the 25th percentile, between the 75th and 84th percentiles, and above the 85th percentile in a US reference population with that of individuals whose BMI was between the 25th and 75th percentiles. Risk of death from endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases and from circulatory system diseases was increased in the two highest BMI categories for both sexes. Relative risks of ischemic heart disease death were 2.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3, 3.6) for males and 3.7 (95% CI: 2.3, 5.7) for females in the highest BMI category compared with the reference. There was also an increased risk of death from colon cancer (males: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1, 4.1; females: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.5), respiratory system diseases (males: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4, 5.2; females: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4, 4.8), and sudden death (males: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.3; females: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 6.6). Adolescent obesity was related to increased mortality in middle age from several important causes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据