4.6 Article

Arsenic Exposure During Pregnancy and Size at Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study in Bangladesh

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 169, 期 3, 页码 304-312

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn332

关键词

arsenic; Bangladesh; birth weight; cohort studies; maternal exposure; urine

资金

  1. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
  2. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
  3. United Kingdom Medical Research Council
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Department for International Development (DfID)
  6. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR, B)
  7. Global Health Research Fund-Japan
  8. Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI)
  9. Uppsala University
  10. US Agency for International Development (USAID)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors evaluated the association of prenatal arsenic exposure with size at birth (birth weight, birth length, head and chest circumferences). This prospective cohort study, based on 1,578 mother-infant pairs, was conducted in Matlab, Bangladesh, in 2002-2003. Arsenic exposure was assessed by analysis of arsenic in urine collected at around gestational weeks 8 and 30. The association of arsenic exposure with size at birth was assessed by linear regression analyses. In analysis over the full range of exposure (6-978 mu g/L), no dose-effect association was found with birth size. However, significant negative dose effects were found with birth weight and head and chest circumferences at a low level of arsenic exposure (< 100 mu g/L in urine). In this range of exposure, birth weight decreased by 1.68 (standard error (SE), 0.62) g for each 1-mu g/L increase of arsenic in urine. For head and chest circumferences, the corresponding reductions were 0.05 (SE, 0.03) mm and 0.14 (SE, 0.03) mm per 1 mu g/L, respectively. No further negative effects were shown at higher levels of arsenic exposure. The indicated negative effect on birth size at a low level of arsenic exposure warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据