4.6 Article

Antidiabetic Medication and Prostate Cancer Risk: A population-based Case-Control Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 168, 期 8, 页码 925-931

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn190

关键词

case-control studies; diabetes mellitus; drug therapy; Finland; incidence; population; prostatic neoplasms

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [205 862]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Cancer Society
  4. Pirkanmaa Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation
  5. Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital
  6. Irja Karvonen cancer trust
  7. Astellas,

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decreased risk of prostate cancer in diabetic men has been reported. The authors evaluated the association between antidiabetic medication use and prostate cancer at the population level. All incident prostate cancer cases in Finland during 1995-2002 were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Matched controls were provided by the Population Register Center (24,723 case-control pairs). Information on medication use was obtained from a comprehensive prescription database. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were computed by using conditional logistic regression. The authors found that prostate cancer risk was decreased for antidiabetic medication users (odds ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.92). The decrease was observed for most drug groups. The odds ratio decreased in a dose-dependent fashion by quantity of use. Duration of antidiabetic treatment was inversely associated with overall prostate cancer risk and risk of advanced cancer. Similar risk reduction for users of different antidiabetic drugs suggests that diabetes, instead of the medication itself, is behind the association. This finding is unlikely to be secondary because of differential uptake of the prostate-specific antigen test or different prostate-specific antigen levels between medication users and nonusers; prevalence of testing in Finland is low. Dose and time dependency of the relation probably indicates that duration of diabetes is negatively associated with risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据