4.6 Article

Environmental Exposures and Invasive Meningococcal Disease: An Evaluation of Effects on Varying Time Scales

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 169, 期 5, 页码 588-595

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn383

关键词

case-control studies; environment; environmental exposure; meningitis; meningitis; bacterial; meteorological factors; Neisseria meningitidis; regression analysis

资金

  1. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21AI065826-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an important cause of meningitis and bacteremia worldwide. Seasonal variation in IMD incidence has long been recognized, but mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain poorly understood. The authors sought to evaluate the effect of environmental factors on IMD risk in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, a major urban center. Associations between monthly weather patterns and IMD incidence were evaluated using multivariable Poisson regression models controlling for seasonal oscillation. Short-term weather effects were identified using a case-crossover approach. Both study designs control for seasonal factors that might otherwise confound the relation between environment and IMD. Incidence displayed significant wintertime seasonality (for oscillation, P < 0.001), and Poisson regression identified elevated monthly risk with increasing relative humidity (per 1% increase, incidence rate ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.004, 1.08). Case-crossover methods identified an inverse relation between ultraviolet B radiation index 1-4 days prior to onset and disease risk (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.34, 0.85). Extended periods of high humidity and acute changes in ambient ultraviolet B radiation predict IMD occurrence in Philadelphia. The latter effect may be due to decreased pathogen survival or virulence and may explain the wintertime seasonality of IMD in temperate regions of North America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据