4.5 Article

A novel multidimensional geriatric screening tool in the ED: evaluation of feasibility and clinical relevance

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 623-628

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Geriatric Research Fund (Spital Netz Bern, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purposes: Geriatric problems frequently go undetected in older patients in emergency departments (EDs), thus increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. We evaluated a novel emergency geriatric screening ( EGS) tool designed to detect geriatric problems. Basic procedures: The EGS tool consisted of short validated instruments used to screen 4 domains (cognition, falls, mobility, and activities of daily living). Emergency geriatric screening was introduced for ED patients 75 years or older throughout a 4-month period. We analyzed the prevalence of abnormal EGS and whether EGS increased the number of EGS-related diagnoses in the ED during the screening, as compared with a preceding control period. Main findings: Emergency geriatric screening was performed on 338 (42.5%) of 795 patients presenting during screening. Emergency geriatric screening was unfeasible in 175 patients (22.0%) because of life-threatening conditions and was not performed in 282 (35.5%) for logistical reasons. Emergency geriatric screening took less than 5 minutes to perform in most (85.8%) cases. Among screened patients, 285 (84.3%) had at least 1 abnormal EGS finding. In 270 of these patients, at least 1 abnormal EGS finding did not result in a diagnosis in the ED and was reported for further workup to subsequent care. During screening, 142 patients (42.0%) had at least 1 diagnosis listed within the 4 EGS domains, significantly more than the 29.3% in the control period (odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-2.29; P < .001). Emergency geriatric screening predicted nursing home admission after the in-hospital stay (odds ratio for >= 3 vs <3 abnormal domains 12.13; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-52.72; P = .001). Principal conclusions: The novel EGS is feasible, identifies previously undetected geriatric problems, and predicts determinants of subsequent care. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据