4.5 Article

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 618-625

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. ZOLL Medical Corporation, Chelmsford, MA (USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: High-quality chest compressions (CCs) are an important component of successful resuscitation. Suboptimal in-hospital CC are commonly reported. Skill degradation and fatigue have been implicated. We assessed the effect of a handheld feedback device on the measured and perceived quality of CC and rescuer physiologic response. Methods: This is a nonblinded randomized controlled study of nurses at an academic medical center. Participants performed CC on a mannequin either with or without a feedback device. Compression rate (CR) and compression depth (CD), heart rate, and oxygen saturation were documented. Perceived quality of CC, fatigue, and ease of use of the device were obtained. Results: Twelve nurses were in the feedback group (FG) and 13 were controls. Mean CD was significantly higher in the FG (1.99 +/- 0.37 in vs 1.52 +/- 0.36 in; P = .005) and mean CR significantly lower in the FG (127 +/- 13.8 per min vs 101 +/- 9.7 per min; P <= .0001). Using a CD of more than 1.5 in and a CR of 90 to 100 as a composite measure of high-quality CC, the FG performed significantly better (81.4% +/- 22.0% vs 10.4% +/- 21.9%; P < .0001). Perceived CD, CR, and fatigue did not differ between groups; however, participants overestimated depth and underestimated rate. The FG rated the design as user-friendly (85% + 26%) helpful in maintaining correct CR (83% + 26%). Conclusion: A handheld accelerometer-based audiovisual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback device significantly improved the quality of CCs provided by experienced hospital nurses in a simulated setting, with no perceived or measured difference in fatigue between the 2 groups. The CPR feedback provides an effective means to monitor and improve CPR performance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据